Talk:Ecotopic League

The NAL's Democratic Socialist Party might belong, do you think? Zahir 06:44, 20 August 2007 (PDT)

Possibly, yes, but then, they're not named ecotopic, so, some might object. But then again, controversy is always fun. BoArthur 17:10, 20 August 2007 (PDT)

Normaly international association of political parties have minimum requirement for entry usualy in the form of a platform. In the case of the Democratic Socialist, even if they share some points with the ecotopic, they might still be a socialist party at heart and so, a member of the International Socialist Alliance (or some such organisation).

I think it is important to remember that on IB, ecotopism is a full fledge political system and not just a tendency.--Marc Pasquin 20:11, 20 August 2007 (PDT)

Thanks for the clarification. Zahir 10:36, 21 August 2007 (PDT)

Are the governments of the officially Ecotopic states members too, or just political parties? Benkarnell 16:31, 28 September 2007 (PDT)

I would say no, that it's the parties that are part of the larger trans-national ecotopic caucus, but the governments (if they're long-standing like Al-Basra and Oregon) are referred to as Ecotopic Republics or Ecotopic Democracies or whatever. BoArthur 17:14, 28 September 2007 (PDT)

Would the NAAEP be a member, do you think? Zahir 18:31, 28 September 2007 (PDT)

A cursory reading of the article would say to me that it would, yes. BoArthur 17:20, 29 September 2007 (PDT)

But would the league accept non-political party as member. *Here* its socialist equivalent is strict in this matter. --Marc Pasquin 22:40, 29 September 2007 (PDT)

I'll defer to your wisdom in this venue, Marc, as I'm not sure about that. BoArthur 17:32, 3 October 2007 (PDT)