Talk:Operation:Polo

That's probably the sort of thing that needs some discussion before you just plunk down an article about it. Elemtilas 02:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I thouht if it didn't interfere with the natural timeline you didn't need any sort of sign indicating it hasn't been absorbed yet. Misterxeight 21:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

I'll second the motion. It has repercussions, and it doesn't hurt to bring things to everyone's attention, anyway. BoArthur 23:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

You think so? Sending thousands of settlers to a foreign city, in a foreign country, presumably for the purposes of taking it over, creates no intereference in the natural timeline? To say nothing of interference in the local composition of the city in question! Do you think California wouldn't mind if China began to dribble over a quarter of a billion people over the next decade?

This is the sort of nonsense we were getting after you for last Spring and Summer. My strong suggestion to you (yet again) is to work on Greece first, get it sorted out. Haven't heard anything of substance since Summer (and little of substance even then). Don't worry about this other ephemera; it's just getting in your way and makes us (me at least) wonder if you've actually paid attention to what we've been telling you about how we operate here. Elemtilas 02:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Hold on: my impression of this page was that it describes something historical rather than something current. I think that it would be a plausible 1930s scenario if it were not China (a Great Power in the 30s). This could well be the origin of the neglected 1930s-era Greek colony in Ethiopia. Benkarnell 23:17, 29 November 2008 (UTC)