Talk:Louis Ferdinand

Looking over Wilhelm III's article again, I realized he could not have been succeeded by Wilhelm IV, who by then was already dead. So I opted for the next eldest son. Zahir 07:40, 1 November 2005 (PST)

I understand your reasoning, but I was aware of the fact that he was dead *here*. My point was actually that he might not have been dead *there*. That would turn him post-1940 into a semi-fictional figure, which gives a little more space to manoeuver; besides, I thought "Wilhelm IV" would sound kinda cool! That is not an objection, BTW. --IJzeren Jan 08:30, 1 November 2005 (PST)

I agree with both your reasons, but for IB purposes, I would lean more toward Jan's POV. BoArthur