Talk:Friedrich II
From IBWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
I think this needs to be corrected. --Sikulu 01:38, 21 February 2006 (PST)
- The question that we're all wondering is, "How?"BoArthur 01:42, 21 February 2006 (PST)
- It looks a bit to much like source material to me (for example, the bit about the annexation of Silesia (which would be a Bohemian province for the duration of the article; not to mention the non-continental British' (I thought the Hanoverians never became British/English rulers.). Or am I making a big fuss about nothing? --Sikulu 01:45, 21 February 2006 (PST)
- History lesson! There was originally an article called Kingdom of Prussia as well as the article Prussia. The former had all kinds of source material (writ by the estimable Bo) and although the consensus was to integrate the two, in practice everyone agreed that would be tricky. So your humble (HA!) servant took it upon himself to take said material and spread it out in articles pertaining to Prussia's kings. Which is not to say that all the material in those articles is flawless. One bit has already been altered (regarding someone's grandson becoming King of England). If something conflicts with QSS it needs fixing. Please list the changes you deem needed, good Master Sikulu, so we can double-check them and then the article will be changed forthwith! Zahir 06:31, 21 February 2006 (PST)
- For a start, on the first line, it mentions that Silesia is an Austrian Province. I was under the impression that Bohemia sepperated from Austria in the 17th centuary in IB. --Sikulu 06:53, 21 February 2006 (PST)
- History lesson! There was originally an article called Kingdom of Prussia as well as the article Prussia. The former had all kinds of source material (writ by the estimable Bo) and although the consensus was to integrate the two, in practice everyone agreed that would be tricky. So your humble (HA!) servant took it upon himself to take said material and spread it out in articles pertaining to Prussia's kings. Which is not to say that all the material in those articles is flawless. One bit has already been altered (regarding someone's grandson becoming King of England). If something conflicts with QSS it needs fixing. Please list the changes you deem needed, good Master Sikulu, so we can double-check them and then the article will be changed forthwith! Zahir 06:31, 21 February 2006 (PST)
- It looks a bit to much like source material to me (for example, the bit about the annexation of Silesia (which would be a Bohemian province for the duration of the article; not to mention the non-continental British' (I thought the Hanoverians never became British/English rulers.). Or am I making a big fuss about nothing? --Sikulu 01:45, 21 February 2006 (PST)
