Talk:Nations of Ill Bethisad

This and the other nation pages are so completely out of date with all the changes that have happened in the last weeks and months that they either need to be drastically re-edited, or deleted. BoArthur

In my opinion we should keep one of them and throw away the other. Two pages (Nations of Ill Bethisad and NOIB) for the same thing was a bad idea to begin with: it means that every change needs to be made twice, that some forget to change the former page and others the latter, and that as a the result both are unreliable right now. So yes, I think one of them must be deleted. But we should do so with care and make sure for each individual country that we pick the right version. I don't really have a preference as to which page to keep. --IJzeren Jan 12:50, 12 Apr 2005 (PDT)

My vote is for keeping this page. I never saw any need to make special pages for each region if they're nothing more than a list. Nik 17:13, 12 Apr 2005 (PDT)

I added that other page in an effort to make it easier to navigate. That list was WAY long. IS any of it necessary with the Categories?

The basic Nations page, I think so. The categories can take care of regions, though.

---

I've updated the page Nations of Ill Bethisad. As far as I am concerned, the page NOIB can safely be deleted now. Some of the underlying stuff can still be of use, though. IJzeren Jan 02:39, 23 May 2005 (PDT)