Talk:Piombino
From IBWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Please debate. Sectori 17:24, 1 December 2006 (PST)
- Well, that was not much of a debate, was it, eh? ;)
- There's not much I can say, really. It looks excellent! Since you are now Italy's official caretakers, I think you won't need to submit detailed info about Italy's member states as proposals, so I'm just boldly going to depropose it.
- I do, however, have one question. What's the story behind these two templates:
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Member Entities | |||
| Alba | Aquilea | Carpi | Ceva | Correggio | Elba | Finale | Friuli | Gonzaga | Guastalla | Istria | Liguria | Lombardy | Lucca | Mantua | Marches | Massa | Metropolitan Duchies | Montferrat | Modena | Nice | Novellara | Ormea | Parma | Piedmont | Piombino | Romagna | Saluzzo | Santa Flora | Savoy | Spoleto | Tavolara | Tenda | Torriglia | Trent | Tuscany | Tyrrhenia | Umbria | Urbino | Venda | Venetia | Vetulonia |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Member Entities | |||
| Aosta | Ceva | Elba | Friuli | Liguria | Lombardy | Mantova | Marches | Massa | Metropolitan Duchies | Montferrat | Modena | Novellara | Parma | Piedmont | Piombino | Romagna | Trento | Tuscany | Umbria | Veneto |
- There are a few states on the old template that have articles about them, which are not on the new template. What's going to happen with them?
- Cheers, —IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu? 12:00, 28 August 2007 (PDT)
