Talk:Egias Sakartuli

Who added this? Nik 15:22, 9 December 2005 (PST)

Why, our mystery editor of course, who refuses to announce themselves, and are looking to get banned. BoArthur 15:24, 9 December 2005 (PST)

That's what I suspect, but I wanted to make sure it wasn't an unlogged-in member before deleting it Nik 15:28, 9 December 2005 (PST)

Let's hold off on deletion, but I'd nominate it and explain why on this page. BoArthur

Hmm, maybe I'm presenting a slightly dissenting point of view here, but in all honesty I can't see anything wrong in this article except the fact that we dislike the behaviour of the anonymous contributor in question. In general, I think we should tolerate anonymous contributions, as long as they don't bite. Of course, we always have the right to revert those edits when we thing they are improper, and no anonymous contributor will ever have the right to consider himself the owner of a country. But as far as I am concerned, this article can stay. --IJzeren Jan 02:42, 10 December 2005 (PST)

I agree. My view is that such things should be done on a case-by-case basis. Zahir 07:58, 10 December 2005 (PST)