File talk:Continental army ranks.jpg

The only nitpick I have, Zahir is that it should be "sergeant" and not sargeant. Otherwise, quite snappy and you have my approval! BoArthur 04:28, 5 December 2005 (PST)

Okay. I'll wait for some further feedback before changing anything, though. Zahir 08:07, 5 December 2005 (PST)

Also, Lieutenant General appears to be of higher rank than actual General... Seth 07:29, 9 November 2007

Nitpick: Lance-Corporal is a lower rank than Corporal in the British Army *here* Geoff 18:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll correct that. And btw, "Lieutenant General" is indeed a higher rank than "General" (or, interestingly enough "Major General"). Zahir 04:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)